Q Park avatar

Q Park TikTok stats

TikTok

@qpark

Profile data checked Aug 6, 2026, 2:35 PM

Report generated Sep 25, 2026, 7:58 AM · Methodology

View profile Compare

Followers

37.5M

About this metric

Public follower count at check time.

Profile likes

486.9M

About this metric

Lifetime likes displayed on the public TikTok profile.

Typical views

875.8K

About this metric

Median views across 17 sampled videos.

Responses / 1K views

69.7

About this metric

Likes, comments, and shares per 1,000 sampled views with public response totals.

Category scores

Out of 100

Bio clarity

Limited

18/100

Topic consistency

Limited

18/100

Publishing cadence

Limited

33/100

Link path

Mixed

70/100

Caption context

Mixed

73/100

Video mix

Mixed

75/100

Profile setup

Strong

90/100

View response

Strong

100/100

Search signals

Strong

100/100

Peer position

116 TikTok profiles · Over 1M · updated Oct 13, 26

Public engagement

27th percentile

27/100

Audit score

33rd percentile

33/100

Bio and content

12 of 17 posts analyzed

The bio contains pointing emojis, fire, and a contact email, but identifies neither the creator’s role nor expected content.

Audience

Viewers interested in dance trends, comedy, Latin pop culture, and football-related entertainment.

Positioning

A personality-led entertainment profile centered on dance performances, trend participation, pop music, comedy, and Latin American football culture.

Bio/content match

Weak

The sampled posts establish dance and pop-culture entertainment, but the bio communicates none of those recurring subjects.

Public views on videos published in the last 30 days

3 videos in window

Share rate

0.28%

Saves / 1K views

4.4

Posting pace

0.7/week

Last post

62d ago

Video patterns

View consistency

Uneven

41%

Captured sample: Median 875.8K / average 2.1M

Top vs typical

Top-heavy

10.7x

Captured sample: Highest sampled result divided by the median

Comment share

Some discussion

1%

Captured sample: 24.9K replies or comments / 2.5M interactions

Publishing pace

Light

0.7/week

Captured sample: 17 posts across the visible sample

Category details

Bio clarity

18/100

The bio contains pointing emojis, fire, and a contact email, but identifies neither the creator’s role nor expected content.

  • Bio opens with two pointing emojis and a fire emoji.
  • Only substantive text is a Greenlight Group contact email.
  • No role, topic, format, or content promise is stated.

Topic consistency

18/100

The sampled posts establish dance and pop-culture entertainment, but the bio communicates none of those recurring subjects.

  • Multiple captions reference dancing or dance trends.
  • Shakira, dembow, Messi, Argentina, Colombia, and Brazil recur.
  • One caption explicitly uses the comedy hashtag.

Publishing cadence

33/100

The captured sample is stale or too irregular to show a reliable publishing rhythm.

  • Newest visible post is 62 days old
  • 3 posts published in the 30-day window
  • 0.7 visible posts per week

Link path

70/100

No external destination was returned; this is treated as optional profile context.

  • No public destination returned
  • Public description found
  • Public contact field found

Caption context

73/100

Many sampled posts provide little visible text context.

  • 17 of 17 posts included text
  • 16 included at least 40 characters
  • 0 included at least 120 characters

Video mix

75/100

The captured sample is broad enough to compare typical results.

  • 17 posts sampled
  • 17 short-form videos
  • 0 long-form videos

Profile setup

90/100

The profile has strong public identity and context signals.

  • Bio found
  • No public destination returned
  • Category unavailable

View response

100/100

The typical sampled upload earns solid public response without relying entirely on one outlier.

  • 66.7 median public responses per 1,000 views
  • 100% median-to-average response-rate consistency
  • 17 uploads with public view counts

Search signals

100/100

The profile and sampled content provide recurring identity and topic signals.

  • Display name and handle identify the same account
  • Recurring topics: qpark, viral, trend
  • Category unavailable

Profile roast

The pointing emojis lead nowhere, while dance-trend captions and hashtag sludge turn this profile into an incoherent hype landfill.

@qpark · C · 66/100

Related profiles

Embed this report

Q Park embeddable score badge
<a href="https://auditmysocials.com/tiktok-audit/qpark?ref=badge&rid=badge-tiktok%3Aqpark&utm_source=shared_report&utm_medium=badge&utm_campaign=profile_referral" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><img src="https://auditmysocials.com/api/badges/tiktok/qpark.svg?variant=score&theme=dark" alt="Q Park TikTok audit: grade C, 66/100" width="360" height="88" loading="lazy"></a>

Plan what to publish next

Use SocialBu to schedule posts, manage replies, and keep your accounts active from one place.

Open SocialBu

Export PDF

Optional report branding

Logo (optional)